In order to understand why it is that factions within our current social and political systems enjoy abusing children within an organised global network, we need to explore the various factors which have made this possible and easily it has been able to function in plain sight for so long. Much of this has to do with widespread denial stemming from a belief that such things are merely the stuff of conspiracy theorists and therefore no self-respecting, rational person would concern himself with such tabloid nonsense. This has proved to be a reoccurring mistake as one quickly understands with a bit of basic intellectual leg-work. But truth about this matters is unpleasant at best, and at worst, offers a glimpse into a veritable abyss of evil, happily piggy-backing our normalcy bias. And it is this confrontation with the shadow which easily sends us back into that habitual denial that pretends all is well, now that the authorities have caught those nasty men. Sadly, this is a standard formula which appears to work very well indeed since it never addresses the core perpetrators, only the minions and handlers who can afford to be thrown to the public coliseum of spectacle.
Perhaps the most scandalous cases at the time of writing in both the United States and Britain were that of American football coach Jerry Sandusky and the late British “philanthropis, television and radio personality Jimmy Savile, both apparent paragons of virtue and highly respected within their communities.
Each individual offers a clear and direct glimpse into the nature of organised child rape networks.
Sandusky was a successful assistant coach and sports author at Pennsylvania State University before being charged with involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, indecent assault, criminal intent to commit indecent assault, unlawful contact with minors, corruption of minors and endangering welfare of children in June, 2012. The coach was also the founder of Second Mile, a non-profit charity for underprivileged and at-risk youth and named as one of President George H.W. Bush’s “Points of Light.”  This organisation was rumoured to be the “perfect cover” for a network of child molestation where Sandusky is alleged to have been “pimping out boys to rich (Penn. State) Donors.”
According to Pittsburg radio personality Mark Madden who had been trying to blow the whistle on the coach for years: “Jerry Sandusky was told by those running the show at Penn State football that Sandusky had to retire after allegations made in 1998 that the defensive coordinator was guilty of ‘improper conduct with an underage male’ leading to his actual retirement in 1999. Madden further commented: “When Sandusky quit, everybody knew; not just at Penn State. It was a very poorly kept secret around college football, in general. That is why he never coached in college football again and retired at the relatively young age of 55, young for a coach.” 
Head coach of the Penn State Nittany Lions and responsible for Jerry Sandusky, Joe Paterno was fired for his role in systematically covering up the scandal in 2011. Before he died of lung cancer in January 2012, Paterno asked prominent Washington criminal defence lawyer J. Sedgwick Sollers to represent him in the sex abuse case. Sollers once represented President George H.W. Bush in the Iran-Contra affair and was oiled in the art of defending the indefensible.  The same old pattern of denial and lost chances were apparent with the Sandusky case as with so many others, so why did it take ten years of common-knowledge abuse before one boy stepped forward? 
Another disturbing feature of this case and consistent with the cover-up of networks is the mysterious disappearance of Ray Gricar, the Centre County, Pa., District Attorney who went missing in April 2005. He chose not to prosecute Sandusky back in 1998, despite allegations of the abuse of children in the coach’s care. The circumstances of his disappearance are more than suspicious. Only Gricar’s abandoned car and a laptop recovered months later in a river without a hard drive, were ever found. According to a New York Times report from September 2011: “A small but strident minority believes Gricar did not want to tackle a case that involved a hometown icon. Others who knew and worked with Gricar say he was a meticulous, independent and tough-minded prosecutor who was unbowed by Penn State, its football program and political pressure in general.”  Disappearances of individuals connected to the possible exposure of abuse networks are extremely common as we will see over the course of this research.
Exactly the same protection and secrecy was afforded to another set of child molesters this time in the Boy Scouts of America. Despite a blacklist meant to protect boys from sexual predators, The Los Angeles Times reported that BSA internal documents called the “perversion files” revealed that:
“… more than 1,200 files dating from 1970 to 1991 found more than 125 cases across the country in which men allegedly continued to molest Scouts after the organization was first presented with detailed allegations of abusive behavior. Predators slipped back into the program by falsifying personal information or skirting the registration process. Others were able to jump from troop to troop around the country thanks to clerical errors, computer glitches or the Scouts’ failure to check the blacklist.
In at least 50 cases, the Scouts expelled suspected abusers, only to discover they had re-entered the organization and were accused of molesting again. In other cases, officials failed to document reports of abuse in the first place, letting offenders stay in the program until new allegations came to light.” 
The report showed that the only reason that confidential documents came to light in recent years was due to lawsuits by former Scouts, “accusing the group of failing to detect abuses, exclude known pedophiles or turn in offenders to authorities.” The Boy Scouts of America have continually fought in court to keep the records from public view for reasons of confidentiality, victim protection and to prevent anyone being falsely accused. However, rather like the Catholic Church, the refusal to release names of child molesters has more to do with protecting the Boy Scout image than the needs of victims.
Over in the United Kingdom a similar story of incredulity on first hearing allegations that the once, much-loved DJ, TV personality Sir Jimmy Savile was in fact, “one of Britain’s most prolific sex offenders.” A number of celebrities have since been arrested and a handful charged with sexual offences under Scotland Yard’s Operation Yew-Tree which believes that Savile was part of a network of abusers across the UK. (Judging on past performances and what we know about these “operations” let’s hope that the innocent public are far from the trawling net of the police and the organised nature of these rings which is focused at the Establishment level.)
Since then, the decision to drop a Savile investigation by the BBC’s flagship current affairs program Newsnight right before allegations broke came under fire for incompetence and institutional apathy regarding the entertainer’s “darker side.” Yet, if this is so, then it seems corruption and a culture of silence also dominated the BBC and related institutions. This is as much a problem as the presence of individual and collective paedophiles and child molesters. A cover-up can be a process of fear and self-censoring, laziness and work load. It was just too much hassle to rock the Savile gravy train.
Yet, Savile was merely yet another psychopathic node in widespread child rape ring which is endemic in politics since it is a primary tool of manipulation through blackmail. The abuse, rape and murder of children at the hands of the Establishment has been going on for years as the video: Savile and the 9th Circle.
Questions remain as to why so many so-called journalists and programme-makers seemingly had no knowledge of Savile’s abuse. Another answer is the naivety of how sexual predators work their magic and rely on our projection of conscience onto their behaviour so that they can continue to operate in plain sight. We all censor what we would rather not wish to believe and that is the greatest protection for any predator. The three monkey maxim of: “Hear no evil, speak no evil, see no evil” is the unspoken rule within the institution it seems, as scores of other employees have been placed under the spotlight for potential sexual abuse allegations, the investigations of which are still on going at the time of writing. How fitting that the BBC – our so called media outlet that is meant to inform the public – actually serves as a potent symbol of wilful blindness in the external world and within its own backyard thus propagating the same.
Expect lots of celebrities to be charged with predatory sexual behaviour against young women, which though repellent, is a very far cry from the kind of Establishment-linked depravity that Savile was up to. There lies the cover and in concert with the discourse of denial and the three monkeys, proves extremely effective.
Journalist Jenny McCartney commenting on the Savile case offers this commentary of just how programmed we have become in defending the indefensible based on our own inculcated paralogical discourse:
Adults who speak out to name paedophiles in “respectable” circles can be made to feel as if they have transgressed some understood code of silence. In 2008 a shocked Pat Cleary went public about the paedophilia of her former husband, Roger Took, a respected art historian and travel writer, after it emerged that he had molested her granddaughters, participated in online discussions about the torture, rape and murder of young children abroad, and possessed 102 “Level 5” photographs involving children, the most cruel and depraved kind. Some of Took’s friends and colleagues attacked her for speaking out: they could not put the image of the highly cultivated man they knew together with such horrific crimes. After his conviction, one of his female friends wrote reprovingly to Cleary: “We have no right to judge and to destroy a person’s life when he wants to live a different life.” Took killed himself in July last year while on probation. 
It is true that there are those characteropaths and psychopaths who can cause the most enormous damage to the fabric of society with exponential effects across generations. The point of including some of these examples from around the world was to show they all have one thing in common: the art of deception as a finely honed but instinctual process emerging in daily life from all social classes but with a frequent occurrence from those who are considered “pillars of the community” where trust is willingly given.
Sandusky, Savile, and the legion of other individuals are merely reflecting the much deeper, systematic and organised networks which nestle so easily in the channels of our societies. Until we truly see the source of these aberrations as symptoms of a much deeper cancer in the very authoritarian institutions which overshadow us, it will not only continue but fully prosper – it has no reason not to. When we begin to see that many of those with psychopathological tendencies insinuate themselves into even minor positions of power and where no limitations and restrictions set down by conscience exist then we can begin to see how easy it is for them to dupe us.
The number of descent people attempting to do their jobs with honesty and integrity, to fight against the tide of an essentially anti-human set of societal constructs is by far the greater everyday interaction. For such predation to be effective the very constructs of “normalised” society must make them vulnerable. The ripple effect of these psychological grenades continues and shapes our destinies in subtle ways. Confusion and misrepresentation of the problem is acute.
Child advocate Andrew Vachss describes it in this way:
The standard movie-of-the-week model is a young child from a loving, caring home on her way to school, and she’s abducted by strangers and ends up somebody’s sex slave in a whole ring. In reality, a vast majority of sexually exploited youth in America, when they are sexually exploited by strangers, were put in a position where that exploitation could take place with virtual immunity because of home conditions.
You cannot compare the guy in a ski mask who jumps out of the back of a van and grabs a kid on the way to school to the predatory pimp who ‘befriends’ a kid who has run away from home because of incest.
Grabbing street kids, grabbing runaway kids, grabbing disaffected kids, grabbing kids who have been thrown away more than run away—it’s not uncommon at all. [Emphasis mine]
We’ll take a deeper look at the social engineering of our relationship to sex and sexuality in contemporary society and which allowed the Establishment psychopath to prey on the public with even greater impunity.